New Exodus

In Is 43, 14-21

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54855/csl.22228
Citations

Keywords:

new exodus, Lord, exile, repatriation, deliverance

Abstract

The Babylonian exile-repatriation event is significant to the Israelites. This is referred to as the 'inner exile,' since the'remembering of Zion' (Ps 137) was forced to lament beside the Babylonian rivers, feeling as if they were 'dead corpses' (Ps 88, 6), 'those in the grave' (Ps 29:4), or 'dry bones' (Ez 37.1-3), etc. However, life in a foreign place was not as terrible as it appeared owing to the people's political policies. of Cyrus the Great. Individuals do not get absorbed just by mixing with their neighbors. Over time, people have increasingly stabilized their lives. As a result, repatriation from Babylon became difficult. Returning home necessitates a fresh start, as the motherland has been ravaged (Ac 1:1-7.8-10.11-17; Ge 1:2-20). The decision to remain or repatriate is a 'dilemma.'

To increase people's urge to return home, several prophets such as Jeremiah, Isaiah, and others made extraordinary efforts. Isaiah used the "exodus" concept in this passage to announce a fresh exodus (Is 43:14-21). The encouragement for this exodus reached a new level as it reawakened the spiritual strength concealed within the people, assisting the Israelites in overcoming the problem of "going out and staying." This essay explores the idea of the new exodus in Is 43:14-21 from three fundamental perspectives: (1) God's deliverance promise; (2) The Lord is the One who keeps the deliverance promise; (3) The new exodus is the new creation.

Author Biography

  • Anton Nguyen Quang Huy, S.J., Institute of Joseph - Society of Jesus

    Anton Nguyen Quang Huy, S.J. is a Jesuit from Vietnam. Nguyen Quang Huy is now enrolled in the second year of theology at Saint Joseph Jesuit Scholasticate, Vietnam.

References

B. Anderson & W. Harrelson, eds. (1962). Exodus Typology in Second Isaiah, in Israel’s Prophetic Heritage: Essays in Honor of James Muilenburg. New York: Harper & Brothers, 181-182.

Cao Gia An (2021). Bài giảng khóa học ‘Ngôn Sứ’ tại Học viện Dòng Tên Việt Nam, tháng 01-02/2021.

Claus Westermann (1969). Isaiah 40-66 - A Commentary. Pennsylvania: The Westminster Press, 125-126.

Dale A. Patrick (n.d.). Epiphany Imagery in Second Isaiah’s Portrayal of a New Exodus. Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa, 126.

Gerand O’Collins (2011). Rethinking Fundamental Theology. Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press, 191-193.

K. M. Yates (1954). The Essentials of Biblical Hebrew, 129.

Leslie C. Allen (1983). Word Biblical Commentary: Vol. XXI - Psalms 101-150. Texas. 174.

Joseph Blenkinsopp (2002). Isaia 40-55 - A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York: Doubleday, 226.

John Goldingay (2014). The Theology of the Book of Isaiah. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 63.

Rolf Rendtorff (1989). Covenant’ as a Structuring Concept in Genesis and Exodus,” in Journal of Biblical Literature, vol.108, no.3. Autumn, 385-393.

Ulrich F. Berges (2012). The Book of Isaiah- Its Composition and Final Form. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 300-302.

Ulrich F. Berges (2012). The Book of Isaiah- Its Composition and Final Form, 303.

Published

28-03-2022

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Nguyen, Q. H. (2022). New Exodus. Catholic Science & Life, 2(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.54855/csl.22228